An honest, no-fluff teardown of the landing page — what to lead with so this doesn't read like "just another inbound-email API".
Page reviewed: emailconnect.eu · Every point references copy that's actually on the page — nothing invented.
You launched with "I got tired of granting mailbox access to trigger workflows by email" — that's a real, visceral pain (handing OAuth access to an inbox is scary and heavy). But the hero leads with the generic "Inbound email, parsed and delivered." I'd put the wedge up top: "Trigger workflows from email — without granting mailbox access." That's the line that makes a developer stop.
Mailgun, Postmark and SendGrid all do inbound parse. On its own, "inbound email → JSON at your webhook" invites "how is this different?" Your real answers are on the page but not framed as differentiators: EU-hosted, GDPR, 100% EU sovereignty and no mailbox access / no OAuth. Make one short "why not Postmark/Mailgun" block — EU data + no inbox access — and the doubt disappears.
"Pristine data, every field accounted for" is a claim; the proof is the payload itself. A tiny real sample — inbound email in, 6-line structured JSON out (sender, subject, parsed body, attachments, spam score) — above the fold sells this faster to a developer than any adjective. You already have "POST /your-webhook" — pair it with the actual shape.
Any inbound email becomes clean JSON at your webhook. EU-hosted, GDPR-compliant, no OAuth into anyone's inbox.
Start free — 100 emails/moKeep "no credit card / GDPR / 100% EU-hosted" as trust chips right under it — they're strong, don't bury them.
I'll rewrite your entire landing page — hero, differentiation, pricing, CTA — in 24 hours. Don't like it? Full refund, keep the notes.
Get the 24h rewrite — €89 →